Winchester Trout Unlimited
Chapter # 638

 

Chapter Information:

Meetings

Newsletters

Work Sessions

Chapter Forum

Event Calendar

Chapter Photos

Links Page

Join TU Now!

Home

 www.tucamp.org 

The Chapel Run Story

With the complete cooperation of Lee Warner, now the full owner at Ellerslie, we have taken on successfully some major problems in the past twelve years beginning with livestock having full access to the stream for watering.  Installation of the local Lord Fairfax Soil and Water Conservation District’s Grazing Land Protection Program dealt with this issue.  The Program involved fencing livestock out of the mile of stream at the farm and installing off-stream watering devices at eight separate locations.  The intent was to reduce erosion of the stream banks and degradation of the stream bed from the impact of thousands of cattle hooves.  Livestock had probably been causing stream damage for more than a hundred years.  

The cost of this Program has probably exceeded $100,000, with Ellerslie Farm paying half and Virginia taxpayers the balance out of funds whose primary purpose is the protection of the Chesapeake Bay.  Fortunately, when the Bay benefits, the local environment benefits as well. 

When we began we did not fully understand the marl geology of the stream channel, but it did not take long to recognize we were dealing with a major challenge.  While some of the stream had a stony bottom, much of the stream bed was simply marl silt created by the grinding up of very light, unconsolidated marl, by cattle hooves – a unique characteristic of this stream’s watershed. 

During the early years we installed bank protection devices at many locations in the lower half of the stream, working upstream from the eastern property boundary.  While those devices were effective in reducing bank erosion, they did not produce much trout habitat.   

When Jack McAllister volunteered a suggestion that we needed to install inverted “V” dams at suitable locations to create deep plunge pools, with his demonstration of the technique at the site now known as McAllister I, we began a new phase in our efforts to create good trout habitat at Chapel Run. 

Inverted V 

During the five years beginning in about 1998, twelve inverted Vs were installed in the lower half of the stream and twelve more in the upper half mile.  All of these structures have performed essentially as planned, although the pools created by some are more effective than others judging by the interest of fish in establishing residence. 

In the remaining years up until today we have concentrated on the creation of additional bank protection/cover at the inverted Vs and at many other locations where steep marl banks erode heavily during flooding and with winter freezing and thawing.  In addition, because of the availability of hundreds of feet of boards produced from dead or fallen trees on the site and logs from other fallen trees, we have narrowed the stream channel in one major section through a long, slow stretch to create a hard bottom by installing long wing dams. 

In all of this work we have utilized at least 100 tons of limestone rock secured from many sources.  Most of the work has been performed with manual labor by Chapter Members during the monthly Saturday morning work sessions that began in 1996 and continue to this day.   

Through this long period we have stocked thousands of trout in the stream.  We have tried all species, but not all sizes of each species.  Our objective initially was to reserve the upper half of the stream for brook trout because a small dam below the road bridge prevents upstream migration of fish stocked below the dam, where we hoped browns and rainbows might be successful.  Twelve inch hatchery brook trout stocked in the upper stretch quickly disappeared, with only one hooked and that one found downstream from the dam. 

Seven to nine inch brown trout stocked downstream from the dam quickly disappeared as well, although one fish survived at the dam long enough to reach 22-23 inches and be hooked several times, but never landed.  Fifteen to sixteen inch browns stocked above and below the dam survived for a year, but only one appeared long enough to reach 22-23 inches and was hooked only once, but not landed. 

Rainbow trout have been stocked in all sizes in all stretches of the stream, but none have been retained long enough for natural reproduction to appear. 

Stocked Rainbow 

As we’ve attempted to analyze our inability to keep stocked fish in the stream, and as a result of several macroinvertebrate studies, we’ve concluded that lack of natural food has played an important role.  The substantial amount of marl silt in the stream bed has simply buried too much stone, rock and woody debris available for healthy macroinvertebrate habitat.  Consequently, in 2007 we initiated an artificial feeding program with the installation of a feeder system which now provides fish pellets daily at two sites.  We continue to experiment with this system.  It does seem to help us hold large rainbow trout, which we stocked early in 2008, although there is evidence that these fish have been willing to move upstream from the upper feeder. 

New Feeder 

While the feeder system is one component in our effort to support the stocked fish, we are finding more and more evidence that another major problem must be addressed if we are ever to achieve a sustained, naturally reproducing population of trout in the stream.  We have long noted the presence of Great Blue Herons on the stream, especially after our trout stockings.  In 2008, we’ve found evidence that at least half of the twenty-one 15-18 inch rainbows stocked in early January have been attacked by GBHs and sustained serious damage, and two fish were found dead from these attacks.  It is likely others have succumbed that we have not seen. 

Many well-meaning suggestions have been offered as solutions to the GBH problem, but none so far have seemed feasible – we continue to ponder the issue. 

The two large rainbows found dead from GBH attacks were both females with large roe sacks.  Whether these fish would have spawned in the spring or fall is unknown.  If some of the large fish survive long enough to spawn this year - and the correct male/female relationships exist – we would hope that naturally reproduced fry might have sufficient instincts and suitable cover to survive and prosper. 

Work on the stream, and the Chapel Run saga, will continue.

Follow this link for more photos of Chapel Run in our Photo Gallery.

 

Chapter Programs:

Trout In Classroom

Chapel Run

Red Bud Run

TIC Photos

Home

 

 

 

 

Click here to go to the TU's TIC website TIC